|
Post by John Zeger on Apr 29, 2006 14:25:09 GMT -5
Nancy M. Wells in the article "At Home with Nature" published in the journal Environment and Behavior, Vol. 32, No.6, Nov. 2000 wrote "In general, studies of high-rise living have found that children who live in high-rise housing tend to exhibit more behavioral problems, have more restricted play, and have poorer physical health than do those who reside in low-rises or single-family dwellings. These findings have generally been interpreted as evidence that living on higher floors leads to social isolation and restriction of play activities, which in turn results in poor behavior and well-being" (p. 779) Wells also writes in the same article "Although studies of housing quality present a somewhat ambiguous picture of the role of physical or natural surrounding (Blackman et al. 1989; Obasanjo, 1998), research on housing type (i.e., high-rises) is clearer in this regard. This research tells us that high-rise housing is associated with behavioral problems (Gillis, 1974; Ineichen & Hooper, 1974; Richman, 1977; Saegert, 1982), less outdoor play (Churchman & Ginsburg, 1984; BDOE, 1973; Gittus, 1976), and poor physical health (Fanning, 1967; Goodman, 1974) among children.
|
|
|
Post by Rick Shea on Nov 17, 2006 11:52:17 GMT -5
The report "Social Sustainability in Vancouver" contains the following comments: Given that, in practice, highrise residential development has always brought more traffic volume, it is clear that harm comes from multiple factors -- more than just the crowding of people together, but resulting from that crowding. www.cprn.org/en/doc.cfm?doc=1538
|
|
|
Post by John Zeger on Apr 14, 2007 9:45:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by John Zeger on Apr 14, 2007 10:15:26 GMT -5
|
|